Timeline for DD4T 2.0 cache not getting invalidated
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2017 at 9:11 | comment | added | rdhaundiyal | AFAIK, it is not there in 2.0 and that i asked in one of the question on this forum | |
| Mar 24, 2017 at 7:32 | comment | added | Neil | Yeah - so that polling mechanism is still there in DD4T 2.0 right? | |
| Mar 24, 2017 at 7:30 | comment | added | rdhaundiyal | @Neil- Tridion object cache get invalidated using RMI but the cache which DD4T 2.0 builds on top of object cache doesnot get invalidated. In DD4T 1.3, there was a mechanism where it keeps on polling broker for an update to invalidate its cache. | |
| Mar 24, 2017 at 7:14 | comment | added | Neil | When you say "does no support RMI" does that mean it doesn't support the Cache Channel Service? | |
| S Mar 24, 2017 at 7:00 | history | suggested | arifbudiman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Corrected spelling, capitalization.
|
| Mar 24, 2017 at 6:02 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Mar 24, 2017 at 7:00 | |||||
| Jan 28, 2017 at 18:11 | answer | added | rdhaundiyal | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 28, 2017 at 17:59 | vote | accept | rdhaundiyal | ||
| Jan 23, 2017 at 3:52 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackTridion/status/823377807988428804 | ||
| Jan 21, 2017 at 12:39 | history | edited | rdhaundiyal | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 42 characters in body
|
| Jan 21, 2017 at 10:44 | answer | added | Quirijn | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jan 21, 2017 at 9:49 | history | edited | rdhaundiyal | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 43 characters in body
|
| Jan 21, 2017 at 9:37 | history | asked | rdhaundiyal | CC BY-SA 3.0 |