Timeline for Enable DD4T cache and Tridion Cache Channel service when using DD4T 2.0.5 (Java) and Tridion 2013 SP1
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2017 at 18:21 | comment | added | Gulshan Thakur | Hi Raymond; Step#2 "Configure your web app to listen to incoming JMS messages" mentioned by you above is specific to ActiveMQ, can you help me to configure same for OSB (as JMS Server). I am looking specifically what to define for bean id="connectionFactory" and bean id="jmsTransportListener" when its OSB and not ActiveMQ. I hope other configurations mentioned above are generic to use for any JMS. | |
| Apr 26, 2017 at 10:14 | comment | added | Raimond | If you turn on the DD4T cache, it will be the main player to improve performance as it will be the primary cache where objects are fetched from. Turning both on essentially is not required as both caches will be invalidated at the same time for items. However for things like linking and dynamic queries you could leave the TOC on. Improvment percentages really depend on your implementation and you can't compare TOC with DD4T's cache as they serve different purposes. For DD4T websites you should always turn on the DD4T cache. | |
| Apr 26, 2017 at 6:27 | comment | added | Gulshan Thakur | Hi Raimond; Thanks; this helps a lot to clarify the doubts; provide road map to proceed/decision making; If comparing TOC and DD4T cache benfits (for a website based on DD4T framework) to increase the performance of website and make page load faster; what should be the rough stats to judge both. Say TOC can increase website performance by 30% and DD4T cache can increase performance by 70% on avg case or TOC has no impact on performance when its DD4T based web-application and only DD4T cache is the key player to improve performance. Any thoughts on same ? | |
| Apr 25, 2017 at 7:31 | history | answered | Raimond | CC BY-SA 3.0 |