Skip to main content
deleted 14 characters in body
Source Link
Nickoli Roussakov
  • 18.4k
  • 4
  • 31
  • 62

The reason that java is wrapped in .net is because java hasoffers the concept of build once, run anywhere. So it makes sense to base it on java, and for .net implementation simply wrap it instead of rewriting the whole thingAPI.

As far as .net shops who aren't comfortable with java modules, it's a moot concern because SDL fully supports this fuctionality and these .net shops do not need to deal with whatever java is deep under the hood.

The reason that java is wrapped in .net is because java has the concept of build once, run anywhere. So it makes sense to base it on java, and for .net implementation simply wrap it instead of rewriting the whole thing.

As far as .net shops who aren't comfortable with java modules, it's a moot concern because SDL fully supports this fuctionality and these .net shops do not need to deal with whatever java is deep under the hood.

The reason that java is wrapped in .net is because java offers the concept of build once, run anywhere. So it makes sense to base it on java, and for .net simply wrap it instead of rewriting the whole API.

As far as .net shops who aren't comfortable with java modules, it's a moot concern because SDL fully supports this fuctionality and these .net shops do not need to deal with whatever java is deep under the hood.

Source Link
Nickoli Roussakov
  • 18.4k
  • 4
  • 31
  • 62

The reason that java is wrapped in .net is because java has the concept of build once, run anywhere. So it makes sense to base it on java, and for .net implementation simply wrap it instead of rewriting the whole thing.

As far as .net shops who aren't comfortable with java modules, it's a moot concern because SDL fully supports this fuctionality and these .net shops do not need to deal with whatever java is deep under the hood.