Skip to main content
2 of 6
added 347 characters in body
Pankaj Gaur
  • 15.9k
  • 1
  • 23
  • 57

High CPU utilization after upgrading to web 8.5

We have upgraded our project based on Tridion 2013 and .Net DD4T 2 to SDL Web 8.5 and DD4T 2.2. We are using CIL and micro services to get data from broker. Once 10-15 concurrent user started browsing the website, the database CPU reached to 100%. We have verified that a particular type of query running on the broker database is taking time to execute and also increasing CPU. Here is the query:

(@P0 int,@P1 int,@P2 int,@P3 int,@P4 int,@P5 nvarchar(4000),@P6 float,@P7 int,@P8 int,@P9 nvarchar(4000))select distinct TOP(@P0)

itemmeta0_.PUBLICATION_ID as col_0_0_, itemmeta0_.ITEM_REFERENCE_ID as col_1_0_,

itemmeta0_.ITEM_TYPE as col_2_0_, itemmeta0_.LAST_PUBLISHED_DATE as col_3_0_ 

from ITEMS itemmeta0_ cross join 

ITEM_CATEGORIES_AND_KEYWORDS relatedkey1_ cross join

TAXFACETS taxonomyit2_ cross join 

ITEM_CATEGORIES_AND_KEYWORDS relatedkey3_ cross join 

TAXFACETS taxonomyit4_ cross join COMPONENT componentm5_ inner join 

ITEMS componentm5_1_ on 

componentm5_.PUBLICATION_ID=componentm5_1_.PUBLICATION_ID and 

componentm5_.NAMESPACE_ID=componentm5_1_.NAMESPACE_ID and 

componentm5_.ITEM_REFERENCE_ID=componentm5_1_.ITEM_REFERENCE_ID cross join 

CUSTOM_META custommeta6_ where itemmeta0_.PUBLICATION_ID=@P1 and 

itemmeta0_.ITEM_REFERENCE_ID=componentm5_.ITEM_REFERENCE_ID and 

itemmeta0_.PUBLICATION_ID=componentm5_.PUBLICATION_ID and 

componentm5_.SCHEMA_ID=@P2 and 

itemmeta0_.ITEM_REFERENCE_ID=relatedkey1_.ITEM_REFERENCE_ID and 

itemmeta0_.PUBLICATION_ID=relatedkey1_.PUBLICATION_ID and 

relatedkey1_.KEYWORD_ID=taxonomyit2_.FACET_ID and 

relatedkey1_.PUBLICATION_ID=taxonomyit2_.PUBLICATION_ID and 

relatedkey1_.PUBLICATION_ID=@P3 and taxonomyit2_.TAXONOMY_ID=@P4 and 

taxonomyit2_.FACET_KEY=@P5 and 

itemmeta0_.PUBLICATION_ID=custommeta6_.PUBLICATION_ID and 

itemmeta0_.ITEM_REFERENCE_ID=custommeta6_.ITEM_ID and 

itemmeta0_.ITEM_TYPE=custommeta6_.ITEM_TYPE and custommeta6_.KEY_FLOAT_VALUE=@P6 and itemmeta0_.ITEM_REFERENCE_ID=relatedkey3_.ITEM_REFERENCE_ID and 

itemmeta0_.PUBLICATION_ID=relatedkey3_.PUBLICATION_ID and 

relatedkey3_.KEYWORD_ID=taxonomyit4_.FACET_ID and 

relatedkey3_.PUBLICATION_ID=taxonomyit4_.PUBLICATION_ID and 

relatedkey3_.PUBLICATION_ID=@P7 and taxonomyit4_.TAXONOMY_ID=@P8 and 

taxonomyit4_.FACET_KEY=@P9 order by itemmeta0_.LAST_PUBLISHED_DATE DESC

It seems CIL is using this query and there is some issue in CIL. Can anyone share if faced similar issue earlier?

Mukesh Kumar
  • 4.1k
  • 14
  • 17