Timeline for SI4T and category/keywords
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2015 at 15:50 | comment | added | Neil | I can but ask Rob! | |
| Dec 14, 2015 at 15:43 | comment | added | Rob Stevenson-Leggett | Any chance of open sourcing the Indexer Neil? | |
| Jun 25, 2014 at 11:26 | vote | accept | Neil | ||
| Jun 24, 2014 at 14:04 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackTridion/status/481437758024876033 | ||
| Jun 24, 2014 at 13:06 | answer | added | Raimond | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jun 24, 2014 at 11:37 | comment | added | Will Price | It seems like you are putting quite a lot of content into keyword meta, it might be better to put this in a component (linked from kw meta), published as a DCP. This would be searchable (you can index DCPs) and additionally you are future proof if you want to treat Country/City content as real content from a CMS point of view in the future (eg have a Country/City page, or create component links to a country or city) | |
| Jun 24, 2014 at 8:10 | comment | added | Neil | Updated with use case. | |
| Jun 24, 2014 at 8:10 | history | edited | Neil | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added use case
|
| Jun 23, 2014 at 19:13 | answer | added | Will Price | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jun 23, 2014 at 18:42 | comment | added | Ant P | What are you using the taxonomy for? Depending on your scenario you may be better off publishing keywords as part of Component metadata and then faceting on the relevant fields. | |
| Jun 23, 2014 at 16:24 | history | asked | Neil | CC BY-SA 3.0 |