In training we had this scenario: "for items in workflow in Experience Manager, I would like to interact with each page to mark or note that I've approved it."

Bundle workflow approval is for all items. So I'm looking for confirmation on:

  1. Would you store the "flag" on the items or with the Bundle? This sounds like AppData.
  2. Is the Task pane that shows the Bundle and its items extendable?

The idea could be a button on Staging pages that are in workflow. Clicking on the button sets a flag that the item was "reviewed" manually. The flags might not do anything aside from remind the reviewer what they've looked at.

2 Answers 2


Note that in the CM domain model, a WorkItem has a Comment property which is intended for this purpose. Unfortunately, this feature is not exposed in the UI (OOTB) yet, but if you want to implement such a feature as an extension, consider using WorkItem.Comment instead of AppData.

The nice thing of WorkItems is that each Activity has its own, distinct set of WorkItems, so that your WorkItem.Comment will be kept for each Activity.

  • WorkItem.Comment for each activity would be easier than trying to manage "per-activity" details ourselves. Nice. Jan 30, 2015 at 14:48

Great idea with the custom button Alvin. In this case, AppData is your best place for storing this info.

However, before jumping into customizations, consider this: You have a bundle of items that is moved through steps in the workflow. A step requiring approval is a Manual Decision. This means that you either approve the whole Bundle (including all the pages within) or you reject the whole Bundle. That is, you don't approve one part of the Bundle, but reject another. It's all or none. And you have a comment field to tell the next person in the flow what hey need to fix.

So, to complete this Manual Decision you select what next step(s)/Activities you want to send the Bundle to and you input a comment. In this comment simply write out the page names or Tcm ID of what needs fixing, and send the Bundle back to the pesky buggers that couldn't get it right the first time.

  • Yeah, that was basically my response in training. It's a manual review so review and place notes at the top. I agreed it would be nice to have a "in context" reminder of what was wrong. The metaphor could be a checklist or maybe reviews for an MVP award program. Maybe I'd like to comment on a candidate's TRex participation specifically, rather than at a candidate level. ;-) Jan 30, 2015 at 14:53

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.