We are setting up the Blueprint on Web 8.5 & have got 2 approaches, however, I would like to understand what could be the best approach which can satisfy the below conditions:
- Optimal use of Inheritance in CM.
- Leverage the full capabilities of Worldserver & cost effective in terms of translation. -
In scenario 1:
Content can be sent to translation from English and will be back in respective languages & will be available for all the inherited countries for that language.
For the languages like Swiss German or Belgium French with dialect, content can be sent from 020 or 040 to get the translation, but would that be cost effective?
Can 040 be completely removed from Scenario 1, I don’t really see a big advantage but someone suggested to be used for best practices.
In Scenario 2:
Content will only be sent from 020 English for targeted languages & Workflow within Worldserver will feed translation memory and send the content back at respective 070 level.
Can such Workflows be set up at World Server level & will this be a cost-effective solution?
Also, here I think inbound/outbound traffic will increase between Tridion & WorldServer as the same component will be coming back twice for BE-FR & FR-FR separately, even if the translated content is same.
Not sure if I was able to explain the scenarios well, would be happy to clarify in case of any doubts, but appreciate the suggestions from experts here as this is quite confusing for me.